Keywords
Academic Integrity
Academic Publishing
Authorship Ethics
Higher Education
Tunisia
How to Cite
Abstract
Background: GenAI systems are now an integral element of academic life, although guidelines for research ethics are mostly based on the experiences of the NorthAmerican and European countries. There is not much information available about the ethical issues related to AI that researchers face in Tunisia as well as whether their institutions have adapted to the developments.
Objective: to record the way faculty members, postgraduate students and editors in Tunisia comprehend and handle the ethical issues related to AI-created academic materials and to investigate whether the current institutional policy provides significant assistance.
Methods: eighteen participants across three institutions (ISET Kasserine, FLSH Sousse, University of Sfax) took part in semi-structured interviews, supplemented by analysis of institutional documents and observation of five research-methods and writing seminars, coded thematically using Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase approach.
Results: awareness of AI ethics was uneven, with only about a third of participants describing solid understanding and a fifth reporting minimal awareness; institutional documents were largely silent on AI, with the great majority of integrity codes making no mention of it; and the concern raised most often was the absence of structured training, followed by uncertainty over authorship attribution.
Conclusion: Tunisian higher education is operating in something close to a policy vacuum on AI-assisted writing. To remedy this situation, it is essential to formulate codes of ethics that incorporate the notion of so-called AI literacy into the educational process of teaching research methods and academic writing.
References
Abdeljaoued, M. (2024). ChatGPT or the language genie: Perspectives and lived experiences of students in Tunisia.
Aithal, P. S., & Maiya, A. K. (2023). Innovations in higher education industry—Shaping the future. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education (IJCSBE), 7(4), 283–311.
Arnold, Z., Schiff, D. S., Schiff, K. J., Love, B., Melot, J., Singh, N., Girard, T., et al. (2024, October). Introducing the AI Governance and Regulatory Archive (AGORA): An analytic infrastructure for navigating the emerging AI governance landscape. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Vol. 7, pp. 39–48).
Ben Saad, H., Dergaa, I., Ghouili, H., Ceylan, H. İ., Chamari, K., & Dhahbi, W. (2025). The assisted technology dilemma: A reflection on AI chatbots use and risks while reshaping the peer review process in scientific research. AI & SOCIETY, 1–8.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 38.
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2023). AI tools and authorship: Position statement. https://publicationethics.org
de Fine Licht, K. (2023, August). Integrating large language models into higher education: Guidelines for effective implementation. In Computer Sciences & Mathematics Forum (Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 65). MDPI.
El Ashkar, C., Nakkash, R., Matar, A., & Makhoul, J. (2024). Behind the scenes of research ethics committee oversight: A qualitative research study with committee chairs in the Middle East and North Africa region. BMC Medical Ethics, 25, Article 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01083-3
Elgamri, A., Mohammed, Z., El-Rhazi, K., Shahrouri, M., Ahram, M., Al-Abbas, A. M., & Silverman, H. (2024). Challenges facing Arab researchers in conducting and publishing scientific research: A qualitative interview study. Research Ethics, 20(2), 331–362.
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Foltynek, T., Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2020). Academic plagiarism detection: A systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(6), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345317
Guesseir, A. (2025). The ethics of academic legal writing in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Research and Studies, 22(1), 125–142.
Gulumbe, B. H., Audu, S. M., & Hashim, A. M. (2024). Balancing AI and academic integrity: What are the positions of academic publishers and universities? AI & SOCIETY, 1–10.
Idris, M. D., Feng, X., & Dyo, V. (2024). Revolutionising higher education: Unleashing the potential of large language models for strategic transformation. IEEE Access.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2023). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations
Iqbal, N. (2023). A comparison of the linguistic encoding of artificial-intelligence-generated academic essays and academic essays written by MSc ALSLA 2022-23 students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford).
Ishkhanyan, A. (2025). Ethical considerations in AI-powered language technologies: Insights from East and West Armenian. AI and Ethics, 1–12.
Maoui, A. (2024). Retraction of biomedical publications with Tunisian affiliation: Causes, characteristics, and legislation regarding breaches of scientific integrity. The Pan African Medical Journal, 48, 182.
Ndubisi, E. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence in personalized learning: Enhancing research integrity. AI and Ethics, Academic Integrity and the Future of Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 2.
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2), 1–24.
Resnik, D. B., & Shamoo, A. E. (2020). The ethics of research: A guide for the 21st century (2nd ed.). Routledge.